Moderation talk:Policy Discussion/Suggestions System

I say we scrap the Humorous = vandalism thing. Most often, people don't think it's hhumorous but others do. It's good faith, but an accident. My idea is that the first time you do it, it gets moved and you are notified, the second time it's considered vandalism, because then you are going against a direct order to not do that. Now, if you display that you do know that humorous suggestions should go in the Humorous suggestions area (Like I am right now), then it is considered warnable. In other words: Common sense people. It's not that hard. -- 19:12, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
 * Ok, I'll fix that up later, but I have to go out now. But I should be back in a few hours time or so. But yeah, that makes sense. - 19:21, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
 * Yeah. If someone suggests something funny or fun that could be ingame, it shouldn't be ruled out as humorous. That should only be if it's clearly something not seriously suggested. There are a lot of little jokes in SW, would hate to see someone get warned for trying to stay with that theme. (Though I'm sure there will eventually be some who don't get that they aren't really.... that hilarious.) -- ♫♪ They say thatMo is one bad mother- shut your mouth! ♫♪ 19:28, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
 * There we go. Only suggestions that are completly humorous and that have no practical implementation can be counted as vandalism. However the user is noted first to the rules. I might just go back and clarify that bit about practical implementation though now that I think about it...- 00:46, 18 October 2006 (PDT)

Not a trace of hypocrisy there... when were we asked about the theft of almost our entire wiki structure? Including most of our templates? 05:11, 21 October 2006 (PDT)
 * Hey, I never stole a thing. Or at least to my memory I didn't, but I don't remember alot of things. If you can point out something that I stole then I'll be quite happy to retract this statement. So as far as I can remember it isn't hypocritical of me to say that. - 01:28, 22 October 2006 (PDT)
 * I wasn't referring to you personally... 03:54, 22 October 2006 (PDT)
 * Fair enough. I just thought you were as I was the only one to make an edit to the page. In that case as you said "Not a trace of hypocrisy there". I'm glad that we are clear on that now. =) If you have an issue as to how this wiki was modeled after the Urban Dead wiki then you should bring it up politely with Mo. I'm sure if you offer a fesiable alternative then he'll be more then willing to listen. However I would take it as a complement that people who no longer use the UD wiki think that its structure is good enough to use on their very own wiki. - 04:52, 22 October 2006 (PDT)