Moderation:Promotions/LordTunnel

LordTunnel
Okay. So Hello. I know there is much residuale hate of me amoungst the Scroll Wars Community. I have vandalized one page: FoG in the past. But, lately I have been only doing positive things in the community. You can see all of my contributions (I warn you I updated things to perfect; hence, the amount of changes): HERE. I spend about 2-3 hours everyday working on the Scroll Wars Wiki. I am currently working on my Banners Page and the helping add coordinates the the map. Remeber, please vouch or don't vouch on how I am now as a member of the Wiki Community not how I have acted as a Pker (which I am stopping) or how I have acted in the past. Thanks and I sincerely hope you vouch for me so I can improve the Wiki Cummnity more. --LordTunnel 10:30, 2 August 2006 (PDT)


 * 1) Veto - His immaturity in-game, combined with his desperation (trying to bribe people in-game) leave me with no other choice. Amanil 02:40, 4 August 2006 (PDT)
 * 2) Abstain - I'm sorry to say this, but what you have done in the past should be relied heavily on as a judge of character. Your need to place your name on numerous pages makes you seem power hungry, rather than just wanting to help out a bit more. --Draaj 10:51, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
 * 3) Vouch - For whatever good it dose I vote for Tunnel. He has contributed alot to the wiki. Miss Grim 10:54, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
 * 4) Veto - I don't feel LordTunnel has developed the maturity to handle the responsibilities of being a moderator on the wikipedia. The attitude and verbal malice he displays consistently in-game are not characteristics that will help him to be a fair, objective, and responsible moderator. I hope when he learns to govern his behaviour more politically he'll apply again.--Mad Mart 4:18, 2 August 2006 (CST)
 * 5) Vouch - I am voting for Lord Tunnel because he has turned himself around quite a bit and has contributed a bunch to most of everything. Ffannimmefan 16:17, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
 * 6) Vouch - After all I have put you through and based on how good you reacted to it afterwords you definitly deserve modship. (I might be shooting myself in the foot for this but whatever)Threepwv 16:39, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
 * Draaj: I have put my name on numberous pages. I have mapped out Wiki (I HELP YOU DO THIS)! I update The Bestiary! I have made the Class page. I have update wiki constantly. I have probably done more than you!--LordTunnel 10:55, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
 * It's not whoever did more on the wiki. My vote was based on the way you act. I know you've done a lot for the wiki, but you've also made up an elaborate story line that you felt everyone else should know. Any page that has anything to do with Tilleria or people you know, you need to put your name in it as if you are more than just a regular player. Those the actions of someone who wants fame (or infamy) and power, and if that's not who you are, then I'm sorry. --Draaj 11:02, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
 * Don't you think the game would be better if everyone decide to make up story lines? Doesn't that add to the fun of the game? You seem to not get into the game. Having to define your player. Just a thought.--LordTunnel 11:04, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
 * I think there should be a limit to what people create as their storylines, not a ban on them. Conflicting storylines would pop up all over the place if everyone did such elaborate stories as you. I could claim that Draaj destroyed Tilleria and became a god, and make 40 pages about it, but that wouldn't mean that it's true nor a legitimate event in DragonSpires. --Draaj 11:14, 2 August 2006 (PDT)

Awaiting bureaucrat decision!!!


 * Bureaucrat: After talking to him, i'm willing to give him a chance. I'd recommend promoting him and lets see how it goes, just keep a close eye on him. The guidelines say that we do not hold past warnings against people, and that means that we give him a chance if he's got the support of the community. I'd like to get Mo's approval before it's done though, as this is a controversial subject.-- 09:31, 3 August 2006 (PDT)


 * Note: I am willing to give Lord Tunnel a trial period for Modship if he is willing to go over the standards and practices of the Wiki with The General or myself. It would be expected that, should Lord Tunnel disrespect or neglect to learn these guidelines, the trial period would be revoked. After a certain set time period if there is no incident, Lord Tunnel would be given Moderator status full time and any problems from there on out would be handled through the Misconduct page. Since Lord Tunnel has recieved no "against" votes and even though I refuse to consider the vote of the 3 page wiki vandal (for obvious reasons - can one truly believe he has the best interest of the wiki at heart without being intensely oblivious to past actions?) plus the fact that he is pressing so hard for a ruling on this - I am going to come halfway and offer this trial period dependant on the applicant's willingness to change some practices that do not fit very well with this site. This would include not placing personal information on public pages unless it is clearly marked as PoV and seperate from the "Official" factual text as well as growing a thicker skin when it comes to the insults of others. As a user he is free to insult them back within reason of course, but as a Moderator one is expected to realize that there's a slightly elevated standard of practice. LT are you willing to agree to this? -- &hearts; Mo M 10:19, 3 August 2006 (PDT)
 * Thank you for the trial period. Can you implement the trial period soon? My email adress is sandronyc@gmail.com; so, I will be avaliable any time to go over the guildlines. Thank you for going half-way! I am currently taking all of my personal information off all public places. I promise not to insult any users (ever) and act very mature (I rly am!) Feel free to accept my gmail friend invation any time Mo. And again, thank you. I will not fail you or The General as a Mod. --LordTunnel 13:43, 3 August 2006 (PDT)
 * Mo?--LordTunnel 17:03, 3 August 2006 (PDT)