Talk:Moderation/Policy Discussion/Non-author re's allowed

I can't see how this wouldn't be abused. The suggestions pages would be full of spam which is not good. It is the authors job to highlight why the suggestion should be implemented and it's the voters jobs as to why it shouldn't. If people don't read the other votes which should outline clearly why it shouldn't be implemented then it's their own fault for not being properly informed. - 19:13, 7 October 2006 (PDT)
 * Well, I find that it would be very helpful, plus, who's here that's gonna abuse it? This isn't UD, remember. -- 20:47, 7 October 2006 (PDT)
 * True, however as the community diversifies then there are going to be people who will want to abuse it. I'm currently thinking of upgrading the suggestions system again. But I'm just trying to get the concept down before I make a policy. I'm thinking that it'ld work best if we have a page for each suggestion. However the one issue that I can see with it is that newbies may make a big mess of it. If it was that way then people can quite easily have long and lengty discussions on the talk page about the suggestion so that'ld be good. Well I'm going to think about it for a while anyway, but I don't like the idea of Non-author re's because it can, and probably will clutter up the suggestions page very quickly when we have a much larger community. - 20:56, 7 October 2006 (PDT)
 * I like the idea of using the talk page. -- 21:00, 7 October 2006 (PDT)